Space play/pause · ←→ seek · R restart · F fullscreen
White Hat IQ
AI Construction Platform
Starting services…
// OVERVIEW

Overview dashboard.

cross-project · cross-app · refreshed 23:05

● AGGREGATIONS · 60S 5 PROJECTS · 18 MODES
⚠ test project 10 · delay data saved ⚠ test project 3 · delay data saved
// ACTIVE
5
// DELAYS
2
// CLAIMS
2
// MILESTONES
—
awaiting scheduler endpoint
// DATASETS
0
// WIKI
0

// PROJECT.BUCKETS

Test Project 10 Chat
3/18⚠ DELAY
Test Project 7 Execution
—ACTIVE
Test Project 5 Execution
1/18ACTIVE
Test Project 3
3/18⚠ DELAY
Test Project 1 AnalysisSearchComparison
7/18ACTIVE

// RECENT.ACTIVITY

scheduler-schedule saved to Test Project 10Apr 28
Contract Chat saved to Test Project 10Apr 28
delays-as-built saved to Test Project 10Apr 28
scheduler-schedule saved to Test Project 7Apr 27
scheduler-delay-recovery saved to Test Project 7Apr 27
EXPAND · 5 MORE
dashboard / contracts / contract.analysis

Contract Analysis.

What does the contract say about this delay?

Hybrid search active
📄 SubstationEPC_Contract_v4.pdf
87 clauses indexed · FIDIC Red Book 2017 ✓ Ready

AI Answer · Clause-level findings

Requires Review
Governing clause
Section 8.3 — Notice of Delayp. 42
Contractor obligation
Written notice to Engineer within 7 days of becoming aware of a delay event (per Sub-Clause 20.2).
Actual notice date
Day 11 from design-approval trigger event — 4 days late.
Owner exposure
Under Clause 20.2, late notice may bar the claim for Extension of Time — but not necessarily prolongation cost if owner was not prejudiced.
Recommended position
Reject EOT claim on procedural grounds; reserve rights on cost.3 supporting clauses
dashboard / scheduler / schedule.comparison

Schedule Comparison.

Baseline vs. as-built · critical path impact

DCMA-verified
📊
Project1_EPC_Schedule.xlsx
Baseline · 236 activities
Start: 2026-01-15Finish: 2027-07-22Critical: 38
VS
📊
Project1_AsBuilt_Schedule.xlsx
As-built · through Month 3
Actual start: 2026-01-15Progress: 14%Overrun: +19 WD
Table
Gantt
DCMA
Timeline
Charts
LOB
Activity
Planned
Actual
Δ Days
Duration bar
Crit?
Kick-off & Mobilization
7d
7d
0
Design Review Cycle 1
10d
12d
+2
✓
Design Review Cycle 2
10d
17d
+7
✓
Structural Design Approval
14d
33d
+19
✓
Foundation Excavation
21d
23d
+2
✓
Rebar & Precast Procurement
42d
42d
0
Contractor claim
30 days
EOT notice submitted day 11
→
AI-verified impact
19 working days
Critical path: structural design approval
dashboard / delays / claims.analysis

Delay Claims Analysis.

Matching current claim against 148 historical precedents

5 precedents matched
Parse claim facts
Query historical DB
Retrieve top-5 similar
Generate exposure report

Similar Historical Claims — ranked by relevance

Project
Cause of delay
Claimed
Outcome
Relevance
Al Maryah Tower
Late design approvals (structural)
28 days
Partially Approved · 17d granted
98%
Barakah Phase 2
Late design approvals (MEP)
45 days
Partially Approved · 22d granted
94%
Mussafah Industrial
Design errors + late approvals
22 days
Rejected · notice late
91%
Dubai South Logistics
Late design approvals (civil)
35 days
Partially Approved · 24d granted
87%
Sharjah Ring Road
Contractor-origin design rework
18 days
Rejected · contractor risk
83%
Precedent summary: 3 of 5 similar claims were partially approved (avg 58% of days granted). 2 were rejected — 1 on procedural grounds (late notice, matches this claim), 1 on contractor-origin cause. Expected range: 8–16 working days of EOT; ~$180K–$420K prolongation exposure.
// CROSS-MODULE INTELLIGENCE

What's coming.

Cross-module intelligence · proactive risk · portfolio view

Roadmap · Q2–Q3 2026

AI Recommendations

Coming SoonProactive claim-risk alerts across all projects

Portfolio Risk Heatmap

Coming SoonClaim, schedule & contract risk across every project

Executive Briefings

Coming SoonWeekly auto-briefings for owners & PMs
White Hat IQ
AI for construction projects.
Contracts, Scheduling, Risk Management, and Claims — four intelligent modules, one aware workspace.
0:00
1:00